<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Ollie&#039;s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://home.acheson.org/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://home.acheson.org/blog</link>
	<description>An experiment in WordPress weblogging</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 23:18:21 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Digital Slideshows &#8211; 2 by Digital Slideshows 2 Ollie Blog &#124; Wood TV Stand</title>
		<link>http://home.acheson.org/blog/?p=144&#038;cpage=1#comment-1940</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Slideshows 2 Ollie Blog &#124; Wood TV Stand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 23:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://home.acheson.org/blog/?p=144#comment-1940</guid>
		<description>[...] Digital Slideshows 2 Ollie Blog   Posted by root 1 hour 44 minutes ago (http://home.acheson.org)        The point of this of course is to be able to distribute a complete stand alone slide show either as a downloadable february 15th 2009 tags digital projector fotomagico lq graphics photo to movie 1 comment to digital slideshows 2 gillian powered by wordpre        Discuss&#160;  &#124;&#160; Bury &#124;&#160;    News &#124; Digital Slideshows 2 Ollie Blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Digital Slideshows 2 Ollie Blog   Posted by root 1 hour 44 minutes ago (<a href="http://home.acheson.org" rel="nofollow">http://home.acheson.org</a>)        The point of this of course is to be able to distribute a complete stand alone slide show either as a downloadable february 15th 2009 tags digital projector fotomagico lq graphics photo to movie 1 comment to digital slideshows 2 gillian powered by wordpre        Discuss&nbsp;  |&nbsp; Bury |&nbsp;    News | Digital Slideshows 2 Ollie Blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on America&#8217;s Challenge by Civil Rights</title>
		<link>http://home.acheson.org/blog/?p=68&#038;cpage=1#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Civil Rights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 02:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://home.acheson.org/blog/?p=68#comment-53</guid>
		<description>America&#8217;s Challenge &#124; Ollie&#039;s Blog is a great article, you have made a reader out of me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>America&#8217;s Challenge | Ollie&#8217;s Blog is a great article, you have made a reader out of me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Iraqi End Game by oacheson</title>
		<link>http://home.acheson.org/blog/?p=178&#038;cpage=1#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>oacheson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://home.acheson.org/blog/?p=178#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Good depiction of the policy dilemma: stay and get savaged or leave and get savaged. It&#039;s a real pick-your-poison kind of choice. I obviously don&#039;t know.

==Ollie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good depiction of the policy dilemma: stay and get savaged or leave and get savaged. It&#8217;s a real pick-your-poison kind of choice. I obviously don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>==Ollie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Iraqi End Game by John Salomone</title>
		<link>http://home.acheson.org/blog/?p=178&#038;cpage=1#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>John Salomone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://home.acheson.org/blog/?p=178#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Mr. Lind’s doomsday scenario certainly holds merit in terms of Iraqi’s propensity for internecine squabbling, the extent that it could escalate and the disastrous consequences for any residual US force structure remaining in country.

What is equally dismaying is the notion that even should we successfully vacate Iraq prior to the onset of any civil unrest, the resulting alignment with the Iranian (Shiite) forces will create a homogeneous, nuclear-tipped “super-nation” stretching from Afghanistan through Syria and, you guessed it, right up to the Israeli border.   

You tell me. Is it better to reinforce military elements already in country, or to (re)invade a much larger and stronger “unified” Islamic front?

Or, does anyone actually think that such a brave new Muslim world will, all of a sudden, become pacifistic in nature?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Lind’s doomsday scenario certainly holds merit in terms of Iraqi’s propensity for internecine squabbling, the extent that it could escalate and the disastrous consequences for any residual US force structure remaining in country.</p>
<p>What is equally dismaying is the notion that even should we successfully vacate Iraq prior to the onset of any civil unrest, the resulting alignment with the Iranian (Shiite) forces will create a homogeneous, nuclear-tipped “super-nation” stretching from Afghanistan through Syria and, you guessed it, right up to the Israeli border.   </p>
<p>You tell me. Is it better to reinforce military elements already in country, or to (re)invade a much larger and stronger “unified” Islamic front?</p>
<p>Or, does anyone actually think that such a brave new Muslim world will, all of a sudden, become pacifistic in nature?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Digital Slideshows &#8211; 2 by Gillian</title>
		<link>http://home.acheson.org/blog/?p=144&#038;cpage=1#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Gillian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://home.acheson.org/blog/?p=144#comment-50</guid>
		<description>Interesting! You have lots of good information in here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting! You have lots of good information in here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Martin Luther King Jr.&#8217;s Birthday and Barack Obama&#8217;s Inauguration by John Salomone</title>
		<link>http://home.acheson.org/blog/?p=104&#038;cpage=1#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>John Salomone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://home.acheson.org/blog/?p=104#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Oy!...place #1 in the #2 slot..&amp; vice versa!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oy!&#8230;place #1 in the #2 slot..&amp; vice versa!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Eulogy for Lieutenant General Victor “Brute” Krulak by John Salomone</title>
		<link>http://home.acheson.org/blog/?p=100&#038;cpage=1#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>John Salomone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://home.acheson.org/blog/?p=100#comment-12</guid>
		<description>OK So I&#039;ve got my comments reversed into the wrong fields - shoot me:
********************************
There is enough subject matter that could be compiled about the Black history and its emerging social presence in this nation as to make War and Peace look like the summary section of an old beat up copy of a Monarch Review Note (remember those?)

I am a Republican by genetic code and usually vote that way.  This past election was no exception. Unlike some of my family &amp; friends, who shall remain nameless, I must admit to being somewhat energized by the prospects of having a Black American becoming the 44th President of the United States of America.

This is so not simply because he is Black, but for the faith and promise he proposes to lavish upon the American people.

I shall not attempt trivialize, in a single sentence, all that you and countless others have written about Jim Crow and the shameful legacy that that mindset once had and yet continues to wreak upon a lasting perception of the Black mystique in this country.

Duly noted are the exploits of those who had cobbled together the courage and fortitude to rise above those stigmatizations. 

Sadly, there are elements on BOTH sides of the color spectrum that are to blame for their continuance.

Let’s return to the concept of the role model that was mentioned earlier, specifically the BLACK role model.

Arguably, the music (Rap) and sports (Football, Basketball, Baseball) arenas serve to form the largest pools from which role models are typically culled in today’s Black culture.

Just who are these “Role Models” anyway?  All too often classless and morally decrepit souls that might otherwise comprise the lower rungs on the social ladder were it not for a singular talent in a particular field that has no useful purpose other than to serve to supply an endless source for a ridiculously overpaid role in an ever expanding recreative marketplace.

All too frequently their elevated stature does little to elevate their moral status and often serves to further their prurient interests. This bizarre transformation creates an &quot;elitist&quot; who is (mistakenly) presumed to be exempt from the very laws and moral codes of conduct that the “commoners” of our society are duty bound to adhere to.

…but it doesn’t end there. How often does one pick up the paper only to discover that a Black, holding high office, has been indicted for yet another transgression upon the very society they were entrusted to serve? 

It would appear that even education and the discipline to seemingly rise above the shackles of their getto heritage are insufficient to dissuade them from behaving like their forbears, albeit on a higher plain.

Hush!.................One cannot speak this way in today’s culture, lest we sound akin to the Jim Crows of the past.

Ownership must be taken by both sides to the fence if the Black population is ever to be truly “free”.

Free from prejudice. Free from indigency. Free from the sort of behavior that serves to swell our welfare roles and expand our prison populations.

As long as the parasympathetic response of virtually all self styled Black leadership is to cry “outrage” rather than seek introspection, an eternal impasse shall be imposed on the very people who seek social and economic parity with their White counterparts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK So I&#8217;ve got my comments reversed into the wrong fields &#8211; shoot me:<br />
********************************<br />
There is enough subject matter that could be compiled about the Black history and its emerging social presence in this nation as to make War and Peace look like the summary section of an old beat up copy of a Monarch Review Note (remember those?)</p>
<p>I am a Republican by genetic code and usually vote that way.  This past election was no exception. Unlike some of my family &amp; friends, who shall remain nameless, I must admit to being somewhat energized by the prospects of having a Black American becoming the 44th President of the United States of America.</p>
<p>This is so not simply because he is Black, but for the faith and promise he proposes to lavish upon the American people.</p>
<p>I shall not attempt trivialize, in a single sentence, all that you and countless others have written about Jim Crow and the shameful legacy that that mindset once had and yet continues to wreak upon a lasting perception of the Black mystique in this country.</p>
<p>Duly noted are the exploits of those who had cobbled together the courage and fortitude to rise above those stigmatizations. </p>
<p>Sadly, there are elements on BOTH sides of the color spectrum that are to blame for their continuance.</p>
<p>Let’s return to the concept of the role model that was mentioned earlier, specifically the BLACK role model.</p>
<p>Arguably, the music (Rap) and sports (Football, Basketball, Baseball) arenas serve to form the largest pools from which role models are typically culled in today’s Black culture.</p>
<p>Just who are these “Role Models” anyway?  All too often classless and morally decrepit souls that might otherwise comprise the lower rungs on the social ladder were it not for a singular talent in a particular field that has no useful purpose other than to serve to supply an endless source for a ridiculously overpaid role in an ever expanding recreative marketplace.</p>
<p>All too frequently their elevated stature does little to elevate their moral status and often serves to further their prurient interests. This bizarre transformation creates an &#8220;elitist&#8221; who is (mistakenly) presumed to be exempt from the very laws and moral codes of conduct that the “commoners” of our society are duty bound to adhere to.</p>
<p>…but it doesn’t end there. How often does one pick up the paper only to discover that a Black, holding high office, has been indicted for yet another transgression upon the very society they were entrusted to serve? </p>
<p>It would appear that even education and the discipline to seemingly rise above the shackles of their getto heritage are insufficient to dissuade them from behaving like their forbears, albeit on a higher plain.</p>
<p>Hush!&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..One cannot speak this way in today’s culture, lest we sound akin to the Jim Crows of the past.</p>
<p>Ownership must be taken by both sides to the fence if the Black population is ever to be truly “free”.</p>
<p>Free from prejudice. Free from indigency. Free from the sort of behavior that serves to swell our welfare roles and expand our prison populations.</p>
<p>As long as the parasympathetic response of virtually all self styled Black leadership is to cry “outrage” rather than seek introspection, an eternal impasse shall be imposed on the very people who seek social and economic parity with their White counterparts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Martin Luther King Jr.&#8217;s Birthday and Barack Obama&#8217;s Inauguration by John Salomone</title>
		<link>http://home.acheson.org/blog/?p=104&#038;cpage=1#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>John Salomone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://home.acheson.org/blog/?p=104#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Regarding the eulogy for General Krulak: it is with a certain degree of shame that I must confess to not knowing much about this particular individual – Marine or otherwise.

For a guy who often has a lot to say, I am startlingly NOT a very well read person.  This deficiency becomes glaringly apparent in instances such as these.

During my stint, as a 2nd Lieutenant at the Basic School, we were “indoctrinated” with varying degrees of Marine Corps history, much of which covered individuals who, over the course of history, achieved some sort of notability for their contributions and/or sacrifices to the Marine Corps, justice and the American way (sorry all you Superman fans).

With no intent to diminish this mans stature in any way whatsoever, the year in question (1973) would probably have predated his ascension to a “hall-of-fame” stature at that point.

Beyond all of this, I take great pride in being part of an organization that has established a veritable pantheon so many vaunted personalities that it is in its own way inadvertently serves to diminish all but its most venerable. The flip side of this is, of course, the humbling side effects that these celebrities have had on my own crumbling persona.

Not to digress any further into a whimpering and totally irrelevant direction; it is always a pleasure to learn more about persons whose courage and integrity (should) form the cornerstones of true role models in our society.

This last remark serves as a rather slick segue into my/your next topic: MLK &amp; Barack Obama’s inauguration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the eulogy for General Krulak: it is with a certain degree of shame that I must confess to not knowing much about this particular individual – Marine or otherwise.</p>
<p>For a guy who often has a lot to say, I am startlingly NOT a very well read person.  This deficiency becomes glaringly apparent in instances such as these.</p>
<p>During my stint, as a 2nd Lieutenant at the Basic School, we were “indoctrinated” with varying degrees of Marine Corps history, much of which covered individuals who, over the course of history, achieved some sort of notability for their contributions and/or sacrifices to the Marine Corps, justice and the American way (sorry all you Superman fans).</p>
<p>With no intent to diminish this mans stature in any way whatsoever, the year in question (1973) would probably have predated his ascension to a “hall-of-fame” stature at that point.</p>
<p>Beyond all of this, I take great pride in being part of an organization that has established a veritable pantheon so many vaunted personalities that it is in its own way inadvertently serves to diminish all but its most venerable. The flip side of this is, of course, the humbling side effects that these celebrities have had on my own crumbling persona.</p>
<p>Not to digress any further into a whimpering and totally irrelevant direction; it is always a pleasure to learn more about persons whose courage and integrity (should) form the cornerstones of true role models in our society.</p>
<p>This last remark serves as a rather slick segue into my/your next topic: MLK &amp; Barack Obama’s inauguration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 21st Century War by John Salomone</title>
		<link>http://home.acheson.org/blog/?p=86&#038;cpage=1#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>John Salomone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://home.acheson.org/blog/?p=86#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Kudos on your successful spelling of Stephanopoulos; that was a remarkable feat in of itself.

Ollie, I am afraid that we are now looking over the edge of an enormous crevasse, which could allow for an eternal exchange of point and counter point, with respect to the futility of the Palestinian situation, without the bottom ever becoming visible.

In a bizarre sort of way, Hamas continues to maintain a macabre advantage over the IDF. As long as it can survive and continue to take an occasional pot shot at an Israeli citizen or soldier, it can perpetually maintain a justification for its purpose.

Sadly it is this sort of absurdity that forms the basis for virtually all extremist Muslim organizations world wide. How can any rational human being deal with the irrational?

You spoke of “total annihilation” as being the only certain way, albeit tongue-and-cheek, for the Israelis to prevail. Clearly neither one of us can begin to contemplate that as the “final solution”.  Other people at other places in time tried that one.  I suspect that with the possible exception of what Rome inflicted upon Carthage, it hasn’t worked since.

What’s left then?

I suspect that we’re back to that slippery slope previously referred to as the “hearts and minds” approach.

This will be an up hill battle indeed for it will require the formation of a MODERATE Muslim coalition of nations and humanitarian organizations that can supplant the ubiquitous hate mongering that consumes so much of the Muslim world.

This will pose a tremendous challenge for anyone that proposes moderation in the face of extremism, by extolling the true tenants of Islam, is sure to be placed on someone’s hit list. If countries such as Saudi Arabia and Pakistan feel compelled, to this present day, to talk out of both sides of their mouth for fear of Wahhabist reprisal what chance can there be for any true reformation in the Muslim world?

I do not believe that there is currently a think tank any where in the universe that is expansive enough to figure that one out.

Hopefully one will pop up soon and put a little egg on Nostradamous’s face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos on your successful spelling of Stephanopoulos; that was a remarkable feat in of itself.</p>
<p>Ollie, I am afraid that we are now looking over the edge of an enormous crevasse, which could allow for an eternal exchange of point and counter point, with respect to the futility of the Palestinian situation, without the bottom ever becoming visible.</p>
<p>In a bizarre sort of way, Hamas continues to maintain a macabre advantage over the IDF. As long as it can survive and continue to take an occasional pot shot at an Israeli citizen or soldier, it can perpetually maintain a justification for its purpose.</p>
<p>Sadly it is this sort of absurdity that forms the basis for virtually all extremist Muslim organizations world wide. How can any rational human being deal with the irrational?</p>
<p>You spoke of “total annihilation” as being the only certain way, albeit tongue-and-cheek, for the Israelis to prevail. Clearly neither one of us can begin to contemplate that as the “final solution”.  Other people at other places in time tried that one.  I suspect that with the possible exception of what Rome inflicted upon Carthage, it hasn’t worked since.</p>
<p>What’s left then?</p>
<p>I suspect that we’re back to that slippery slope previously referred to as the “hearts and minds” approach.</p>
<p>This will be an up hill battle indeed for it will require the formation of a MODERATE Muslim coalition of nations and humanitarian organizations that can supplant the ubiquitous hate mongering that consumes so much of the Muslim world.</p>
<p>This will pose a tremendous challenge for anyone that proposes moderation in the face of extremism, by extolling the true tenants of Islam, is sure to be placed on someone’s hit list. If countries such as Saudi Arabia and Pakistan feel compelled, to this present day, to talk out of both sides of their mouth for fear of Wahhabist reprisal what chance can there be for any true reformation in the Muslim world?</p>
<p>I do not believe that there is currently a think tank any where in the universe that is expansive enough to figure that one out.</p>
<p>Hopefully one will pop up soon and put a little egg on Nostradamous’s face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 21st Century War by oacheson</title>
		<link>http://home.acheson.org/blog/?p=86&#038;cpage=1#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>oacheson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://home.acheson.org/blog/?p=86#comment-7</guid>
		<description>John - thanks for the offer, but I&#039;ll probably keep my day job .

I certainly can&#039;t argue that Gaza is a big mess, just as the West Bank is and a bunch of other places in the Middle East are. I think that Obama summed up the situation well yesterday morning in his interview by George Stephanopoulos when he said that the primary duty of any government is to protect its citizens. Rockets raining on your cities tend to elicit strong responses.

My point wasn&#039;t that they shouldn&#039;t have gone into the Gaza, but rather that anything short of total annihilation will probably not work. At best it will neutralize the terrorists for a while while your hopefully well-prepared second offensive takes them out. Problem is, nobody seems to know what that is. I talked to a couple of Israeli business acquaintances a few months ago and one comment stood out: in the past (10 or 15 years ago) Israelis were hopeful that the situation was improving, if glacially. Today there is no hope.

That sentiment was echoed by Stephanopoulos&#039;s fellow commentators. Tom Friedman, I believe, said that this is the worst he has ever seen the Middle East. They basically had no thoughts of a solution. Unfortunately the momentum toward any kind of peace in Palestine reversed when Arafat rejected the final Clinton peace proposals in 2000. It has been all down hill since then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John &#8211; thanks for the offer, but I&#8217;ll probably keep my day job .</p>
<p>I certainly can&#8217;t argue that Gaza is a big mess, just as the West Bank is and a bunch of other places in the Middle East are. I think that Obama summed up the situation well yesterday morning in his interview by George Stephanopoulos when he said that the primary duty of any government is to protect its citizens. Rockets raining on your cities tend to elicit strong responses.</p>
<p>My point wasn&#8217;t that they shouldn&#8217;t have gone into the Gaza, but rather that anything short of total annihilation will probably not work. At best it will neutralize the terrorists for a while while your hopefully well-prepared second offensive takes them out. Problem is, nobody seems to know what that is. I talked to a couple of Israeli business acquaintances a few months ago and one comment stood out: in the past (10 or 15 years ago) Israelis were hopeful that the situation was improving, if glacially. Today there is no hope.</p>
<p>That sentiment was echoed by Stephanopoulos&#8217;s fellow commentators. Tom Friedman, I believe, said that this is the worst he has ever seen the Middle East. They basically had no thoughts of a solution. Unfortunately the momentum toward any kind of peace in Palestine reversed when Arafat rejected the final Clinton peace proposals in 2000. It has been all down hill since then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
